Cash & Profitability
How do we extend runway without raising?
Simplify20 September 20268 min read
In short
Most companies can find three to six months of runway without raising anything, and without the cuts founders fear most. The order matters: collect what you are owed, bill earlier, stop spending that does not serve the next milestone, fix pricing, and only then look at the cost base. Each lever has a different speed and a different cost, and taking them in the wrong order usually damages the business more than the shortage would have.
The conversation usually starts the same way. Runway is shorter than it looked three months ago, the market is slower than planned, and the founder is deciding between a bridge round on unattractive terms and a round of cuts nobody wants to make.
Both are real options. Neither is the first one. In most companies there are three to six months of runway sitting inside the business already, in cash that has been earned but not collected, spending that no longer serves anything, and prices that have not moved in two years.
This is the order worth working through, and roughly what each step is worth.
Start with money you have already earned
Collections is the fastest lever in almost every business, and the least used, because chasing feels uncomfortable and cutting feels decisive.
Work out what is sitting in receivables: revenue a day multiplied by the days customers actually take to pay. For an Indian B2B company collecting in 70 days on 45-day terms, that number is often two months of revenue, and a third of it is already past terms.
- Call the finance contact at your five largest debtors this week. Not an email, a call. A surprising share of overdue invoices are stuck on a missing purchase order reference or an approval nobody chased.
- Invoice everything delivered but not billed: milestones completed, change requests, usage above plan. Most firms find a week or two of revenue sitting unbilled.
- Start invoicing the day work is delivered rather than at month end. On its own this takes days out of the cycle permanently.
- Set an escalation schedule and follow it for everyone, so chasing stops being a decision each time.
- If you are registered as a micro or small enterprise, the MSMED Act's payment periods and interest give you a legitimate lever with large buyers.
Ten to fifteen days of improvement is realistic within a quarter without discounting anything. On ₹50 lakh of monthly revenue, fifteen days is about ₹25 lakh, which for a company burning ₹15 lakh a month is most of two months of runway.
Then bring revenue forward
The second lever is timing rather than amount. The same revenue, received sooner, funds the same costs with less cash tied up.
- Offer annual prepayment to customers due for renewal, with a modest discount. Price it honestly: 10% off for twelve months up front is expensive if you do not need the cash, and cheap if the alternative is a bridge round.
- Move new contracts to advance or milestone billing. It is far easier to agree at the start of a relationship than to renegotiate later.
- Ask for a deposit on work that requires you to spend before you earn: hiring for a project, buying inventory, committing media spend.
- Invoice monthly rather than quarterly where contracts allow it.
None of this changes the business. It changes when the money arrives, which is the only thing that matters when the constraint is cash rather than profit.
Then stop spending that serves nothing
Every company accumulates spending that made sense once. The test is not whether a cost is useful in general, but whether it serves the next milestone: the thing that has to be true before you raise or reach break-even.
- Software subscriptions nobody uses, duplicated tools, seats for people who left.
- Marketing channels that have never produced a customer you can trace, as opposed to channels whose contribution is hard to measure but visible in the pipeline.
- Projects that were approved in a different market: the second product, the new city, the rebrand.
- Travel and events booked out of habit.
- Contractors and agencies whose output nobody has reviewed in two quarters.
This is usually worth less money than founders hope and more than they expect: five to ten percent of costs in most companies, available within a month, with no effect on the core business. It is also the cheapest possible signal to a team that spending has to be justified.
Then look at pricing
Pricing is the most powerful lever and the slowest to act, which is why it belongs here rather than first.
The arithmetic is simple. If your contribution margin is 60% and you raise prices 8%, you can lose about 12% of volume before total contribution falls. Most companies lose far less than that, particularly when the rise applies to new customers and renewals rather than to everyone at once.
Two practical routes. Raise list prices for new customers immediately, which costs nothing and affects nothing you have already sold. And review discounts: in most companies a sales team has been granting them for years without anyone measuring the gap between list price and realised price.
An illustrative example: a company with ₹40 lakh of monthly revenue at 60% contribution margin, raising realised prices by 6% on half its base over two quarters, adds about ₹1.2 lakh of monthly contribution. Not dramatic, but permanent, and it compounds with every new customer after it.
Then the cost base, carefully
Only now is it worth looking at people and fixed commitments, and the order within this step matters too.
Start with what has not been committed: roles approved but not yet hired, increments not yet announced, the office expansion not yet signed. Pausing these costs nothing and saves a great deal, because a role not filled is the cheapest reduction available.
Next, look at contracts with notice periods: office space, annual tools, agency retainers. Savings here arrive when the notice runs out, so starting the conversation now moves the benefit into the window where it helps.
Redundancies come last, and need modelling before they are announced, because they usually cost cash in the first month. Notice pay or pay in lieu, leave encashment, gratuity for anyone with enough service, and full and final settlements all land within days. A reduction can therefore make next month worse and the following quarter better, which is fine if it was planned and painful if it was not.
A worked example
An illustrative company, with invented figures. Revenue ₹50 lakh a month, costs ₹65 lakh, so burn is ₹15 lakh. Cash ₹1.35 crore, which is nine months of runway. Collections run at 70 days against 45-day terms.
- Collections: fifteen days of improvement releases about ₹25 lakh of one-off cash.
- Annual prepayment from four customers due for renewal brings forward about ₹18 lakh.
- Discretionary spending: ₹4 lakh a month of tools, travel and an agency retainer stopped.
- Pricing: 6% on new business and renewals, worth about ₹1.5 lakh a month of contribution within two quarters.
- Two unfilled roles paused, worth ₹3.5 lakh a month against the plan.
The one-off items add ₹43 lakh of cash. The recurring items reduce burn from ₹15 lakh to about ₹6 lakh. Runway goes from nine months to well beyond twenty, without a single redundancy and without raising anything.
Not every company finds this much. Most find more than they expected, and almost all find enough to change the terms of the fundraising conversation.
What not to do
- Do not stop depositing TDS or the employee share of PF to fund payroll. It is other people's money, and the consequences are serious.
- Do not offer deep discounts across the board for early payment. Price them, and use them on the specific invoices that move the tightest week.
- Do not cut the spending that produces revenue and keep the spending that does not. It happens more often than it should, because the second kind is easier to cut.
- Do not announce cuts before modelling their cash cost in the first month.
- Do not let quality slip on delivery to save money. Churn is far more expensive than the saving.
- Do not do all of this quietly. A leadership team that understands the constraint makes better decisions than one that notices the founder has become anxious.
What each lever is worth, and how fast
- Collections: usually the largest single amount, available within a quarter, and entirely one-off. It buys months, not a lower burn rate.
- Advance and milestone billing: moderate, permanent once contracts change, and slow because it only applies to new agreements and renewals.
- Discretionary spending: five to ten percent of costs in most companies, available within a month, and it reduces burn rather than adding cash.
- Pricing: the most valuable over a year, and the slowest to arrive, because most of it lands at renewal.
- Unfilled roles and uncommitted spending: immediate, painless and often the largest reduction in burn available.
- Contract renegotiation and redundancies: slowest, most painful, and the only ones that can cost cash before they save it.
Read the list as a sequence rather than a menu. The first five are available to almost every company and together usually double runway. The last one exists for when they are not enough, and it is far easier to do once, well informed, than twice in six months.
Telling the team and the board
Founders often run this exercise quietly, on the theory that talking about cash will frighten people. In practice a leadership team that knows the constraint makes better decisions inside it, and the team notices the anxiety anyway.
What works is specific and bounded: here is our runway, here is the milestone we are funding, here is what we are doing about collections and spending, and here is what we are not doing. The last part matters most, because the fear is usually about jobs, and saying plainly that headcount is not the lever being pulled, when it is not, removes most of it.
With investors, the same conversation is better held early and with the arithmetic attached. A founder who says runway has moved from nine months to twenty through collections, pricing and paused hiring is describing control. The same founder in three months, asking for a bridge, is describing a problem.
When extending runway is the wrong answer
Sometimes the honest conclusion is that the business does not reach anything worth reaching, however long the runway is stretched. A product with no retention, a market that has not appeared, or unit economics that get worse with scale will not be fixed by another six months.
In that case the useful question is different: what would have to be true to justify continuing, how quickly could you test it, and what would you do if the test failed? Extending runway to buy time for a specific test is a decision. Extending runway because the alternative is uncomfortable is a delay.
The calculators on this site can help with the arithmetic either way. The default alive calculator shows whether the business reaches break-even before the money runs out on current growth, and the collections calculator puts a number on what your customers are holding. Both take a few minutes, and between them they usually reframe the conversation before anyone calls an investor.
Sources
About Simplify
Simplify is a finance clarity and investment readiness practice working with founders across India, built on six years inside startups. We write about the questions founders bring before a decision, not after it.
Not sure what your numbers are telling you?